Cyborg Soldier 2050: Human/Machine Fusion and the Implications for the Future of the DOD report and all there patents
Operation warp speed 2020 comes to mind with all the nanotechnologies they're finding in human blood. here I'll show you
I think that we need to start a bio preservation act or a bio preservation law to protect the unvaccinated as well as any body that does not want to except a so-called vaccine nanotech biocyber interface injection as we are becoming a endangered species under threat, you might not be dead but you won't be human anymore, and to protect the wildlife and the forest from geo-engineering spraying and changing the genome of everything, so they can patent it, so they can tokenize it in the real world and in the digital twin world. You will own nothing and be happy. Remember that phrase?… You see if there's a federal, or any maybe, court case and there is biological, being human involved say like how the vaccines injure people or change your genome or turn you into a cyborg there's a law that they have to protect the biological tissues or evidence I guess you could say. Is that a loophole to protect the unvaccinated ? Or anybody for that matter?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3600A
And here is a court case saying that you own the airspace above your physical property so all the geo engineering and chemtrelling crap could be a law breaking offense.
https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/LI/consCheck.cfm?txtType=HTM&ttl=74&div=0&chpt=55
Carrie Madej
Cyborg Soldier 2050: Human/Machine Fusion and
the Implications for the Future of the DOD https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1083010.pdf?fbclid=IwY2xjawEsjGBleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHYhQbNVo0JMqR6AgVX44SPw05G4eaJrgedbj-R7XxyddAdhhXq3Rz2xR7Q_aem_j7em0vqH0iheGyigE2LCCQ what do you think about these next videos and the stuff that is putting humanity in the bracket of extinction level event
https://rumble.com/v5b3ocy-nanotech-and-transhumanism-discussion-between-dr.-ana-mihalcea-and-dr.-will.html 1. Clynes, M.E.; Kline, N.S. Cyborgs and Space. Astronautics 1960.
2. Haraway, D. A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the
Late Twentieth Century. In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature;
Routledge, New York, 1991; pp 149–181.
3. Shook, J.R.; Giordano, J. Neuroethics Beyond Normal: Performance Enablement and
Self-Transformative Technologies. Camb Q Health Care Ethics 2016, 25, 121–140.
4. https://www.asrs.org/publications/retina-times/details/131/fda-approves-world-first-
artificial-retina (accessed 30 September 2018).
5. O’Donnell, F.; Stahlman, S.; Williams, V. Medical Surveillance Monthly Report;
(MSMR) Annual Summary Issue. 2017.
6. Dollar, A.; Herr, H. Lower Extremity Exoskeletons and Active Orthoses: Challenges and
State-of-the-Art. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2008, 24 (1), 144–158.
7. Yong, J.S.-e.; Wang, D.-Y. Impact of Noise on Hearing in the Military. Mil. Med. Res.
2015, 2, 1–6.
8. Nguyen, C.H.; Karavas, G.K. Artemiadis, P. Inferring Imagined Speech Using EEG
Signals: A New Approach Using Riemannian Manifold Features. J. Neural. Eng. 2018,
15 (1), 016002.
9. An Integrated Brain-Machine Interface Platform with Thousands of Channels:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/703801 (accessed 30 September 2018).
10. Wurzman, R.; Giordano, J. NEURINT and Neuroweapons: Neurotechnology in National
Intelligence and Defense. In Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense:
Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns; Giordano, J., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca
Raton, FL, 2015, pp 79–114.
11. Hill, N.J.; Wolpaw, J.R. Brain-Computer Interface. In Reference Module in Biomedical
Sciences. Elsevier: Salt Lake City, UT, 2016.
12. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/14/health/paralysis-limb-reanimation-brain-chip.html
(accessed 30 September 2018).
13. Abdulkader, S.N.; Atia, A.; Mostafa, M.-s.m. Brain Computer Interfacing: Applications
and Challenges. Egypt. Informatics J. 2015, 16 (2), 213–230.
14. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07573-w (accessed 30 September 2018).
15. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01770-x (accessed 30 September 2018).
24
16. Zou, Q.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Ouyang, Z.; Long, H.; Wei, S.; Xin, J.; Zhao, B.; Lai, S.;
Shen, J. Generation of Gene-Target Dogs Using CRISPR/Cas9 System. J. Mol. Cell Biol.
2015, 7 (6), 580–583; https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjv061 (accessed 30 September
2018).
17. Chen, C.; Andriola, J.; Giordano, J. Biotechnology, Commercial Veiling, and
Implications for Strategic Latency: The Exemplar of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology
Research and Development in China. In Strategic Latency: Red, White, and Blue.
Managing National and International Security Consequences of Disruptive Technologies;
Davis, Z., Nacht, M., Eds.; Lawrence Livermore Press: Livermore, CA, 2018, pp 12–32.
18. Garden, H.; Winickoff, D. Issues in Neurotechnology Governance. OECD Science,
Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2018/11, OECD Publishing, Paris.
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/industry-and-services/issues-in-neurotechnology-
governance_c3256cc6-en (accessed 30 September 2018)
.
19. Palchik, G.; Chen, C.; Giordano, J. Monkey Business? Development, Influence and
Ethics of Potentially Dual-Use Brain Science on the World Stage. Neuroethics 2017, 10,
1–4.
20. Coats, D.R. Statement for the Record: Worldwide Threat Assessment of the U.S.
Intelligence Community. Report to Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 29 January,
2019, pp 25–26.
21. https://www.pewinternet.org/wp-
content/uploads/sites/9/2016/07/PS_2016.07.26_Human-Enhancement-
Survey_FINAL.pdf (accessed 30 September 2018).
22. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2016/07/26/u-s-public-wary-of-biomedical-
technologies-to-enhance-human-abilities/ (accessed 30 September 2018).
23. Shook, J.R.; Giordano, J. Ethics Transplants? Addressing the Risks and Benefits of
Guiding International Biomedicine. AJOB-Neurosci 2017, 8 (4), 230–232.
24. https://jme.bmj.com/content/35/7/398.full (accessed 30 September 2018).
25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/janimalethics.5.2.0181?seq=1#page_scan_tab_conte
nts (accessed 30 September 2018).
26. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1075547011408928 (accessed
30 September 2018).
27. Wittes, B.; Chong, J. Our Cyborg Future: Law and Policy Implications; Brookings Center
for Technology Innovation: Washington, DC, 2014, p 15.
28. Shook, J.R.; Giordano, J. Moral Bioenhancement for Social Welfare: Are Civic
Institutions Ready? Front. Sociol. 2017, 2 (21), 1–5.
25
29. Kraft, C.; Giordano, J. Integrating Brain Science and Law: Neuroscientific Evidence and
Legal Perspectives on Protecting Individual Liberties. Front. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 1–10.
30. Giordano, J. Battlescape Brain: Engaging Neuroscience in Defense Operations. HDIAC J.
2017, 3 (4), 13–16.
31. Chang, C.-H.; Lane, H.-Y.; Lin, C.-H. Brain Stimulation in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front.
Psychiatry 2018, 9 (201).
32. Lawson, B.D. Tactile Displays for Cueing Self-Motion and Looming: What Would
Gibson Think? In Advances in Cognitive Engineering and Neuroergonomics, AHFE
International Conference, Krakow, Poland, 19–23 July, 2014; Stanney, K., Hale, K.S.,
Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Switzerland, 2014; pp 3–13.
33. DeFranco, J.; DiEuliis, D.; Bremseth, L.R.; Snow, J.J.; Giordano, J. Emerging
Technologies for Disruptive Effects in Non-Kinetic Engagements. HDIAC J. 2019,
6 (2), 49–55.
34. Tennison, M.N.; Giordano, J.; Moreno, J.D. Security Threat versus Aggregated Truths:
Ethical Issues in the Use of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology for National Security. In
Neuroethics: Anticipating the Future; Illes, J., Hossain, S., Eds; Oxford University Press:
Oxford, UK, 2012; pp 531–553.
35. Gini, A.; Rossi, J.; Giordano, J. Considering Enhancement and Treatment: On the Need
to Regard Contingency and Develop Dialectic Evaluation. AJOB Neurosci. 2010,
1 (1), 25–27.
36. Weinberger, A.B.; Cortes, R.A.; Green, A.E.; Giordano, J. Neuroethical and Social
Implications of Using Transcranial Electrical Stimulation to Augment Creative
Cognition. Creativity Res. J. 2018, 30 (3), 249–255.
37. Shook, J.R.; Giordano, J. Moral Bioenhancement for Social Welfare: Are Civic
Institutions Ready? Front. Sociol. 2017, 2 (21), 1–5.
38. Giordano J. Conditions for Consent to the Use of Neurotechnology: A Preparatory
Neuroethical Approach to Risk Assessment and Reduction. AJOB Neurosci. 2015,
6 (4), 12–14.
39. Committee on Ethical and Societal Implications of Advances in Militarily Significant
Technologies that Are Rapidly Changing and Increasingly Globally Accessible. In
Emerging and Readily Available Technologies and National Security: A Framework for
Addressing Ethical, Legal, and Societal Issues; Chameau, J.L., Ballhaus, W.F., Lin, H.S.,
Eds; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2014.
26
40. Lanzilao, E.; Shook, J.; Benedikter, R.; Giordano, J. Advancing Neuroscience on the 21st
Century World Stage: The Need for — and Proposed Structure of — an Internationally
Relevant Neuroethics. Ethics Biol. Engineer. Med. 2013, 4 (3), 211–22
The United States federal government owns the most patents in the United States, with an estimated 30,000 patents and thousands of new applications filed each year. The government funds nearly half of the country's research and development (R&D) through government-owned research facilities, university grants, and private industry contracts. The government also has rights to thousands of nonexclusive, royalty-free licenses in other patents.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issues patents, which grant a property right to an invention. This right allows the patent holder to prevent others from making, using, selling, or importing the invention in the United States for the duration of the patent. The government patents inventions and discoveries from successful public research, but the patents can restrict the use, sale, and manufacturing of those inventions. The government's goal is to distribute the benefits of public research as widely as possible, and the key principle behind patenting is that granting a proprietary right can encourage inventions.
The government can also license technologies and intellectual property owned by federal agencies to non-governmental parties. This helps to mature federal innovations so that they can be manufactured and made available to the public The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army 82.6%
The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army 2.9%
United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army, The 1.2%
Drexel University 0.9%
Government Of The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army, The 0.7%
The United States Government As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army 0.7%
The Government Of The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army 0.4%
The United States Government As Represented By The Secretary Of The Arm Y 0.4%
The Henry M. Jackson Foundation For The Advancement Of Military Medicine, Inc. 0.4%
The Government Of The United States, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army 0.4%
The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy 0.4%
Loyola University Of Chicago 0.3%
The Government Of The United States As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army 0.3%
South Dakota Board Of Regents 0.3%
The Regents Of The University Of Michigan 0.3%
The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health And Human Services 0.2%
University Of Massachusetts Lowell 0.2%
The American National Red Cross 0.2%
https://open.substack.com/pub/operationsavehumanity/p/federal-vision-for-future-computing?r=24qa7g&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web https://open.substack.com/pub/operationsavehumanity/p/patents-assigned-to-the-government?r=24qa7g&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/FY2025/budget_justification/pdfs/03_RDT_and_E/RDTE_Vol1_DARPA_MasterJustificationBook_PB_2025.pdf?fbclid=IwY2xjawEiA3tleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHTHY3le-gypufBi_KVPqDA0-xC23t2fi6XXLWG32IGeGewA0qdA346C-TQ_aem_P6msEbl2_g8Af6wOzekh6g
https://patents.google.com/?assignee=The+United+States+Of+America+As+Represented+By+The+Secretary+Of+The+Army&oq=+The+United+States+Of+America+As+Represented+By+The+Secretary+Of+The+Army+
The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health And Human Services 14%
The Government Of The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Department Of 6.7%
Health And Human Services 1.9%
University Of Iowa Research Foundation 1.9%
The Government of the United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the 1.9%
Centers For Disease Control And Prevention 0.9%
The Government Of The U.S.A. As Represented By The Secretary Of The Dept. Of Health & Human Services 0.9%
ザ ガバメント オブ ザ ユナイテッド ステイツ オブ アメリカ アズ リプレゼンテッド バイ ザ セクレタリー, デパートメント オブ ヘルス アンド ヒューマン サービシーズ,センターズ フォー 0.9%
CLASS 977,NANOTECHNOLOGY well if you made it this far congratulations you are the winner of today's high five
The Bible verse Daniel 2:43 says, "And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men; but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay"